Research Project Descriptions

David J. Lewis

Assistant Professor

Agricultural and Applied Economics

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Most of my projects are motivated by the desire to understand how policies can be designed to enhance ecosystem services that are impacted by human land-use decisions.  My research tends to have a quantitative empirical foundation with an emphasis on linking economic models with research from disciplines such as ecology, geography, conservation biology, and limnology.

Current Projects

*      The economics of reducing wildlife habitat fragmentation

*      Residential development on amenity-rich landscapes

*      Spatial externalities and agriculture in developing countries

*      Incentive-based policies for biodiversity

*      Amenities and rural development

 

The economics of reducing wildlife habitat fragmentation

Collaborators: Andrew Plantinga (OR St.), JunJie Wu (OR St.), Ralph Alig (USFS), Jennifer Swenson (NatureServe).

This project is aimed at exploring the effects of incentive-based land-use policies on habitat fragmentation.  While fragmentation effects have been shown to have significant impacts on many species of wildlife, there has been very little research on policies aimed at mitigating fragmentation.  One component of this project is a theoretical model to understand policy design under the presence of spatial externalities and incomplete information.  A second component is an empirical framework which links econometric models of land-use conversion with GIS-based landscape simulations to examine the impacts of various policies on the spatial pattern of land conversion. A third component uses the empirical model to test a theoretically-optimal policy design against other policy designs.

Working Papers

Lewis, D.J., Plantinga, A.J., and J. Wu. 2007. “Targeting Incentives to Reduce Habitat Fragmentation.” Working Paper. PDF.

Refereed Journal Articles

Lewis, D.J., and A.J. Plantinga. 2007. “Policies for Habitat Fragmentation: Combining Econometrics with GIS-Based Landscape Simulations.” Land Economics, 83(2): 109-127.

Alig, R.J., D.J. Lewis, and J.J. Swenson. 2005. “Is Forest Fragmentation Driven by the Spatial Configuration of Land Quality? The Case of Western Oregon.” Forest Ecology and Management, 217: 266-274.

Back to top

Residential development on amenity-rich landscapes

Collaborators: Bill Provencher (UW), Van Butsic (UW student), Eric Horsch (UW student).

This project is designed to understand factors that influence land conversion and human settlement patterns on amenity-rich landscapes, with northern Wisconsin lakes serving as a detailed case study.  Land development has been shown to have adverse impacts on both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, yet residents are often drawn to landscapes rich in ecosystem amenities.  A major goal of this project is to examine the effects of open-space conservation policies on the ecology of lake systems.  One component is an attempt to understand the role of policy in facilitating the sorting of heterogeneous residents across the landscape.  A testable hypothesis is that certain types of residents are more likely to engage in voluntary conservation activities, a result that has substantial implications for policies that facilitate sorting.  A second component is the development of various spatial econometric models of the micro-scale decision to develop land.  These models are used to simulate the effects of policies on development and link with limnology and wildlife ecology models to understand the ecological effects of various land development paths.  A third component examines the non-market value of preventing the spread of invasive species that can significantly alter ecosystem services.  An understanding of the non-market values associated with the services impacted by invasive species will help design policies to prevent their spread.

Refereed Journal Articles

Lewis, D.J., Provencher, B., and V. Butsic. 2007. “The Dynamic Effects of Open-Space Conservation Policies on Residential Development Density.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (Forthcoming). See AAE Staff Paper No. 522.

Horsch, E.J., and D.J. Lewis. 2008. “The Effects of Aquatic Invasive Species on Property Values: Evidence from a Quasi-Random Experiment.” Land Economics (Forthcoming). PDF Version of working paper.

Working Papers

Lewis, D.J. 2008. “An Economic Framework for Forecasting Land Use and Ecosystem Change.” Working Paper. PDF Version.

Lewis, D.J. and B. Provencher. 2007. “The Implications of Heterogeneous Preferences for Environmental Zoning.” Working Paper. PDF.

Provencher, B., Lewis, D.J., and J. Schoen. 2007. “Effects of Environmental Zoning on Household Sorting: Empirical Evidence and Ecological Implications.” Working Paper. See version to be presented at 2007 AAEA meetings: PDF Version.

 

Back to top

Agricultural spatial externalities, development, and the environment

Collaborators: Brad Barham (UW), Karl Zimmerer (UW).

This project – which links resource and development economics – is funded by NSF and is aimed at understanding the influence of spatial externalities on agricultural land-use choice and environmental quality in the context of both developing and developed countries. Spatial externalities can link the return stream of farm income on adjoining parcels of land and hence exert potentially important influences on landscape pattern.  Our primary goal is to understand the land-use policy implications of physical and social externalities that have a spatial dimension.  This research aims to shed light on the underlying structure and potential identification strategies associated with quantifying agricultural spatial externalities from observations of landscape change. Applications examine bio-diverse Maize production in the Andean region of Peru and organic farming in the United States. These analyses have policy implications for watershed and biodiversity conservation, and international development programs.

Refereed Journal Articles

Lewis, D.J., Barham, B.L., and K. Zimmerer. 2008. “Spatial Externalities in Agriculture: Empirical Analysis, Statistical Identification, and Policy Implications.” World Development (In Press), doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.10.017. See AAE Staff Paper No 519.

Back to top

Incentive-based policies for biodiversity and ecosystem services

Collaborators: Steve Polasky (U of MN), Andrew Plantinga (OR St.), Erik Nelson (U of MN / Stanford), Josh Lawler (U of WA), Denis White (EPA), Eric Lonsdorf (Lincoln Zoo), Volker Radeloff (UW)

This multi-disciplinary project is aimed at modeling the effects of incentive-based land use policies on biodiversity and other ecosystem services, such as carbon sequestration.  The team is a mix of economists and ecologists and this work uses econometric models to predict the spatial pattern of landscape change and resulting biodiversity outcomes in response to incentive-based policies.  The first component of the project is focused on the Willamette Basin in western Oregon.  We evaluate multiple payment schemes that target incentives in a spirit similar to the most common incentive-based conservation programs used by the U.S. government.  We also solve for the landscape pattern that produces the maximum amount of biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration, and evaluate the efficiency of the incentive payments against the optimal landscape. The second component scales up the Willamette project to the lower 48 states.  This project is the first study to fully integrate an economic model of observed land conversion with an ecological model of biodiversity.  

Refereed Journal Articles

Nelson, E., Polasky, S., Lewis, D.J., Plantinga, A.J., Lonsdorf, E., White, D., Bael, D., and J. Lawler. 2008. “Efficiency of Incentives to Jointly Increase Carbon Sequestration and Species Conservation on a Landscape.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(28): 9471-9476.

Working Papers

Lewis, D.J., Plantinga, A.J., Nelson, E., and S. Polasky. 2008. “The Efficiency of Voluntary Incentive Policies for Preventing Biodiversity Loss.” Working Paper. PDF Version.

 

Back to top

Amenities and Rural Development

Collaborators: Andrew Plantinga (OR St.), Gary Hunt (U of ME)

This project is aimed at understanding the effects of environmental amenities on rural development. The principal focus is on examining the effects of publicly-owned conservation lands on migration, employment, and wage growth in the rural northern forest region of the upper Midwest and the northeast.  An econometric model of regional development is developed and used to test various hypotheses on the role of conservation lands in regional economic growth.   

Refereed Journal Articles

Lewis, D.J., G.L. Hunt and A.J. Plantinga. 2003. “Does Public Lands Policy Affect Local Wage Growth?” Growth and Change, 34(1): 64-86.

Lewis, D.J., G.L. Hunt and A.J. Plantinga. 2002. "Public Conservation Land and Employment Growth in the Northern Forest Region." Land Economics, 78(2): 245-259.

Back to top

 

Last revised: 8/30/08